ON THE POLITICAL CHARACTER OF A GENUINE SCHOLAR OF ISLAM & THAT OF THE EVIL SCHOLAR

Oct 23, 2020 - 10:53
 925
ON THE POLITICAL CHARACTER OF A GENUINE SCHOLAR OF ISLAM & THAT OF THE EVIL SCHOLAR

by Shaykh Muhammad Shareef bin Farid

One of the profound statements that my teacher, Shaykh Habib Umar, may Allah exalt His word by means ‎of him, said in the aftermath of the 9-11 terrorist attack: “You will see the emergence of new forms of ‎hypocrisy (nifaaq).” He was not talking about the hypocrisy of the common believer who persists in sin and ‎disobedience to Allah ta`ala. Nor was he speaking of the hypocrisy of a man giving a solemn pledge and ‎promise to a friend and then willfully breaking that pledge; which is transmitted as one of the key signs of ‎the hypocrite. No, the saintly Friend of GOD from Tarim, was talking about another can of fish.‎

Sayyid Habib Umar was speaking of the hypocrisy which would emerge from the Muslim clerical class who ‎would monetize Islamic knowledge and use it as a pretext for upward mobility with corrupt rulers and ‎merchants. In fact, this destructive trait of the Muslim scholar will be one of the key seventy-two signs of ‎the End of Time. ‎

The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace said:‎

‏((سَيَكُوْنُ فِي أَخِرِ الزَّمَانِ عُلَمَاءُ يُرَغِّبُونَ النَّاسَ فِي اِلْأَخِرَةِ وَلَا يَرْغَبُونَ، وَيُزَهِّدُونَ وَلَا ‏يَزْهَدُوْنَ، وَيَنْهَوْنَ عَنْ غِشْيَانِ الْأُمَرَاءِ وَلَا يَنْتَهُونَ))‏
‎“There will be in the End of Time, scholars, who will inspire people for the Hereafter, but they themselves ‎will not aspire for it; they will encourage the people to be austere, but they themselves will not practive ‎austerity; and they will prohibit humanity from frequenting the rulers, but they will not prohibit themselves ‎from it.”‎

This prophecy, while alarming, also makes us grateful to Allah, that we are witnessing events and trends ‎around us bearing witness to the prophecies of our Beloved Prophet. Like the righteous Ancestors (salif ‎saalih), we too have witnessed the miracles of the master of the Messengers, may Allah bless him and grant ‎him peace with our own eyes.‎

In addition, all praises are due to Allah ta`ala, that He has preserved for us the characteristics of the ‎genuine scholar of Islam in the writings of our African Muslim sages. They gave us a picture, in their states, ‎words, deeds and writings of the sublime political character of the learned helpers of Allah’s religion. By ‎means of them, Allah ta`ala exalts His word, preserves His word and disseminate His word throughout ‎creation. ‎

One of the key differences between the genuine scholar (`aalim `aamil) and the evil scholar (`aalim suu) is ‎the former’s disdain for this world and the latter’s excessive love of this world. The immensity of ‎knowledge and its treasures blinds the genuine scholar to the vulgar glimmering of this world’s life. While ‎the evil scholar uses what knowledge he possesses as a conduit for upward mobility into the halls and ‎courts of the rich and powerful of this world’s life.‎

The genuine scholar, sold this world and its distractions for the immense treasure of knowledge. While the ‎evil scholar monetized the sciences of Islam and rendered the Trust marketable alongside the countless ‎commodities, icons and idols of this world’s life.‎

The Retainer of the Messenger of Allah, Shaykh Ahmad Bamba said in his  Silk al-Jawaahir Fee Akhbaar as-‎Saraa’ir: ‎

وَمِنْ عَلَامَةِ مَحَبَّتِهَا، أَيْ الدُّنْيَا، حُبُّ الْوِلَايَةِ وَالْقَضَاءِ وَمُخَالِطَةِ الْأُمَراءِ وَالوُزَرَاءِ
‎
“Among the signs of love of this world’s life is love of the government and the judiciary and intermixing and ‎socializing with rulers and government ministers.”‎

So, from the very beginning we are confronted with an image of one of the traits of the evil scholar (ulama ‎suu); which is his or her love for this world’s life; and their disdain for knowledge, due to their monetizing of ‎the trust which Allah has given them for the purposes of attaining position in the halls of power.‎

The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace said:‎
‏((حُبُّ الدُّنْيَا رَأْسُ كُلِّ خَطِيئَةٍ))‏
‎“Love of this world’s life is the head of every error.” ‎

The person dedicated to the preserving of knowledge of Allah’s Book, knowledge of the Sunnan of His ‎Messenger and all the beneficial inward and outward sciences of His religion; are obligated to eradicate ‎from their heart love for this world. The scholar of Islam has taken an oath to trade the life of this world in ‎order to attain knowledge of Allah and His religion; and they have taken an oath to never trade the religion ‎of Allah in order to attain anything from this world’s life.‎

The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace also said:‎

‏((مَنْ أَرَادَ النَّجَاةَ مِنَ الْمَعْصِيَةِ فَلَا يُخَالِطُ أَهْلَهَا))‏
‎“Whoever desires redemption from disobedience, then he should not intermix with the people of this ‎world.”‎

Just as it is obligatory for the scholars and carriers of the sacred law to avoid the people of heretical ‎innovation and the people of unfounded opinions; it is likewise obligatory for them to avoid intermixing ‎with rulers and governors. This is because of what is in it of the corruption of the knowledge the scholar ‎and his religion.‎

The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace also said:‎

‏((سَيَكُوْنُ بَعْدِي سَلَاطِيْنٌ، الْفِتَنُ عَلَى أَبْوَابِهِمْ كَمَبَارِكِ الْإِبِلِ، لَا يُعْطُونَ أَحَدًا شَيْئًا إِلَّا ‏أَخَذُواْ مِنْ دِيْنِهِ مِثْلَهُ))‏
‎
“There will exist rulers after me. Tribulation will be at their doors like the resting place of a camel. These ‎rulers will not grant anyone anything except that its like in religion will be seized from that person.”‎

Here the Messenger of Allah, is basically saying that any Muslim scholar who frequents the doors of the ‎rulers, is appointed by them, or is deployed by them; will have his knowledge seized from him equivalent to ‎what he was given or appointed to by the corrupt ruler.‎

A more cogent prophetic pronouncement which places an impregnable barrier between the evil scholar and ‎the genuine scholar is what our Beloved Prophet said as warning to all who take the oath to be bearers of ‎the sciences of the Book, the Sunna and the consensus of this immense religion of Islam. ‎

He, upon him be the most abundant blessings and most perfect peace said:‎
‎
“The scholars are the trustees of the Messengers as long as they do not intermix with the rulers and use ‎their knowledge as a pretext for entering into worldly affairs. For when they intermix with the rulers and ‎use their knowledge as a pretext for entering into worldly affairs, then they would have acted ‎treacherously towards the Messengers. You should then stay clear of them.”‎

The command from the Prophet to avoid and stay clear of the evil scholar, is conditioned by you ‎recognizing the traits which they are tarnished with. It is their propensity to use their knowledge, (which is a ‎Prophetic trust) as a resource to attain prestige, upward social mobility and all the trappings of power and ‎fame.‎

This is unambiguous reprimand for the scholars, jurists and Imams in this era who find themselves ‘advising’ ‎corrupt, tyrannical and unjust governments and their leaders. It is just as immoral for psychiatrist to advise ‎governments how to conduct torture; as it is for Muslim clerics or jurists to advise non-Muslim ‎governments on how and when to invade Muslim nations or to bring about regime change. Iraq, ‎Afghanistan, Libya and Syrian or immediate examples where Muslim jurists and clerics clamored at the ‎gates of the US State Department, falling over one another in order to provide ‘advice’ to overthrow these ‎Muslims governments.‎

On the contrary, the Muslims scholar, jurists and cleric is supposed to avoid the gates of unjust rulers. But ‎especially non Muslim rulers. The scholar, because they are inheritors of the mission of the Prophets, they ‎are supposed to have a somewhat adversarial relationship with the government, through their ‎commanding of good and forbidding of evil.‎

One of our great Africa Muslim scholars, Shaykh Ahmadu Baba relates to us the story of his own father and ‎the extent that this learned jurist went in avoiding the rulers and being harsh towards them. He said about ‎him: ‎
‎
“My father, Ahmad ibn Ahmad ibn Umar ibn Muhammad Aqit, was the son of a learned jurist, the son of a ‎learned jurist. He was an accomplished and intelligent scholar who had mastered many sciences. He was a ‎traditionist, possessed a generous share in the sciences of the foundation of the law, rhetoric and ‎eloquence. He possessed a gentle heart and exalted rank that earned him the respect of the notables of the ‎kingdom. He was sufficient as a benefit to his people by his rank and standing. His intercession was never ‎turned away or refused. He treated the rulers and their officials very roughly and they in turn showed him ‎the utmost of humility. The rulers used to visit him in his home. Once when he became ill in the town of ‎Kaghu, during one of his frequent journeys, the great sultan, Askiya Dawud would come to him at night and ‎watch over him until he became well again.”‎

Here Shaykh Ahmadu Baba tells us that his father treated government officials, the rulers and leaders ‎roughly and avoided their company. It was the rulers who sought him out for unwavering advice, even ‎though he always went out of his way to demonstrate his disdain for the people of power and riches. 

This is ‎a testimony to our ancient African rulers, who rather than summoning the scholars to their gates to deploy, ‎appoint or employ them to rubber stamp their despotism; they would descend from their seat of authority ‎in order to visit the right acting scholars.‎

Shaykh Ahmad Bamba relates this tradition in his Silk al-Jawaahir:‎

‏((إِنَّ اللَّهَ يُحَبُّ الْأُمَرَاءَ إِذَا خَلَطُواْ الْعُلَمَاءَ لِأَنَّ ذَلِكَ يُرَغِّبُهُمْ فِي اَلْأَخِرَةِ، وَيَمْقَتُ الْعُلَمَاءَ ‏إِذَا خَلَطُواْ الْأُمَرَاءَ لِأَنَّ ذَلِكَ يُرَغِّبُهُمْ فِي الدُّنْيَا))‏
‎
 “Indeed Allah loves the leader who goes and intermixes with the scholars, because that kind of behavior ‎inspires the ruler to seek after the Hereafter. But, Allah detest the scholar when he goes to intermix with ‎the rulers, because that behavior inspires the scholar to chase of this world’s life.”‎

Thus, the scholar who dotes over the rulers and the people of power and responds whenever they summon ‎him, has belittled knowledge and the religious sciences and has placed this sacred Trust in other than its ‎rightful place. The scholars actually designate such a “scholar” as being ignorant because in spite of the ‎fact of their preoccupation with the sciences that illuminate the heart and provide the inner-self with clear ‎vision; the learning of the evil scholar is obscured and buried under the darkness of their lust for this world’s ‎life. Their ambitions have made them ignorant to the light they had gathered.‎

It has been related by Sam`an on the authority of Anas that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and ‎grant him peace said: 

“Greed and avariciousness takes away wisdom from the hearts of the scholars.” This ‎results in them not being able to arrive at clear and decisive legal judgements. One of the key traits of the ‎evil scholar who frequents the corridors of power and fame; is that they are forced to constantly apologize ‎for errors in their judgment for working with unjust rulers. They always have to justify their actions and ‎explain why they humiliated and demeaned sacred knowledge by rubber stamping the tyranny of the rulers.‎

‎ ‎

The reality, is that the genuine scholar does not frequent the gates of power and prestige due to the ‎respect and honor they have for sacred knowledge. It is for this reason that Imam Malik said to the Caliph ‎Haruun ar-Rashid, who summoned him to bring the al-Muwatta so that he and his government could listen ‎to its transmission:‎

إِنَّ الْعِلْمَ يُزَارُ وَلَا يَزُورُ، وَلَا تَكُن يَا أَمِيْرَ الْمُؤْمِنِيْنَ أَوَّل مَنْ يَّضَعُ الْعَلْمَ، فَيَضَعَكَ اللَّهُ
‎
“Indeed knowledge is come to, it does not go to. O leader of the believers, do not be the first to humiliate ‎knowledge; or Allah will humiliate you.”‎

Examine, dear reader, how the Imam of Dar’l-Hijra equates scholars answering the summons of rulers, ‎even for a good reason; to humiliating and dishonoring the knowledge .‎

Each time the scholar engages the unjust ruler, they lose a portion of the beneficial sciences that they ‎learned. Thus, the scholar loses his very status as a scholar in the eyes of Allah, by his frequenting the ‎courts of rulers. 

This was further corroborated by the Companion, Abdallah ibn Mas`ud who said:‎

يَدْخُلُ الرَّجُلُ عَلَى السُّلْطَانِ وَمَعَهُ دِيْنُهُ، فَيَخْرُجُ وَمَا مَعَهُ شَيْءٌ
‎
“A man enters upon a ruler and with him is his religion; but then he leaves him without anything.” This is the ‎impact that rulers have upon the common Muslim. The impact that they have on the scholars of the Umma ‎of Muhammad is more devastating because their knowledge is forfeited. This was a mutual fear which all ‎people of learning had when it came to preserving and acting upon their knowledge. The first principle was ‎to avoid unjust rulers.‎

Imam al-Fudayl, reiterated this when he said: “We used to learn about the importance of avoiding rulers, ‎just like we used to learn a chapter from the Qur’an.” This means that it was common practice or covenant ‎which the people of learning took with Allah, to avoid the courts and doors of rulers. It was this condition ‎‎(shart) that distinguished them from the evil scholars.‎

Imam at-Thawri said: “When you witness the Muslim intellectual (qaraa’) keeping close to the rulers, then ‎realize with a certainty that he is a thief (liss).” What is it that he stole if it is not the wealth of knowledge ‎which he then cheapened by melting it down, and transmuting it, like an alchemist, into gold, silver, ‎commodities, social security and rank?‎

Because the evil scholar does not benefit from his knowledge, the scholars do not count him among their ‎assembly; even when he sits among them and wears their attire. They are called ‘intellectuals’ (qaraa’ – ‎those that can read) as an indication of their tendency to quote the books that they read; but fail to act ‎upon.‎

In a derisive prophetic tradition where the Prophet actually uses this prerogative “qaraa” (intellectual) to ‎describe the fate of the evil scholar who frequents the gates of rulers:‎
‎
“In Hell there is a prison from which even the Hell itself seeks refuge from seventy rimes a day. Allah has ‎prepared it for the intellectuals (quraa) who frequently visit the rulers.” This prophetic tradition is so chilling, ‎that only a narcissist full of his own self-importance would think that he is an exception to this Divine ‎Threat; that somehow his veracity and charisma is so profound that his frequenting the halls of power and ‎being deployed by them is an exception.‎

This is the height of arrogance, conceit and narcissism on the part of the scholar, because he/she sees ‎themselves above the edicts of the sharia; and ventures boldly into that dubious area that the Prophet ‎warned every Muslim to avoid. The above prophetic tradition was transmitted in order to frighten the ‎student of knowledge, the bearers of knowledge and purveyors of knowledge from falling into the one trap ‎which snares every heedless scholar.‎

Our most famous narrators of the Prophetic traditions made it covenant with Allah not to frequent the ‎gates of Muslim rulers, let alone corrupt non-Muslim rulers. It has been related that once the ruler of the ‎kingdom of Bukhara in Europe summoned Imam Muhammad la-Bukhari to come to his court with his ‎Saheeh collection so that he and his officials can listen to its transmission. 

The famous traditionist, known ‎as the Amir’l-Mu’mineen of the prophetic traditions responded:‎

أَنِّي لَا أَذِلُّ الْعِلْمَ وَلَا أَتَى أَبْوَابَ السَّلَاطِيْنِ، فَإِن كَانَتْ لَكَ حَاجَةٌ إِلَى شَيْءٍ مِّنْهُ، ‏فَلْتَحْضُرْنِي فِي مَسْجِدِي أَوْ فِي دَارِي
‎
 “I will never be little knowledge; nor will I ever go to the gates of the rulers. But, if you have some need of ‎anything from me, then come to my mosque or to my home.” Examine, dear reader the disdain that our ‎great scholars showed towards people of power and the rulers; and the immense respect that showed to ‎the sacred sciences that they had attained.‎

Imam al-Bukhari saw scholars who frequent the gates of the rulers as humiliating and demeaning the ‎sacred knowledge that they possessed. If this is the view that our great sages had towards scholars who ‎visited the courts and palaces of Muslim rulers, what would be their view of those Muslim intellectuals ‎today who frequent, advise and are deployed by hostile non-Muslim rulers?! We seek refuge with Allah ‎ta`ala from knowledge that has no benefit!‎

Shaykh Ahmad Bamba, rahimahu Allah said in his Silk al-Jawaahir:‎

‎“The scholar who enters upon the ruler is naturally susceptible to disobedience; either by his actions, by his ‎silence or by his words. His susceptibility to disobedience in his actions is his entering into an abode that ‎was more than likely usurped without permission from another; his showing humility to an oppressive ruler; ‎his kissing and kowtowing to him; and sitting among his entourage. ‎

His susceptibility to disobedience by his silence is his being silent from the evils that he witnesses from the ‎unjust ruler; and his listening to obscenities, lies, slander and disinformation and he being unable to do ‎anything about it. Whoever knows of corruption in a place and he knows that he cannot do anything to ‎change it; then it is not lawful for them to be present there.‎
His susceptibility to disobedience by his words is his making supplication for the unjust ruler; his praising ‎them; his acceptance of his lies; and his displaying to the unjust ruler love and cheerfulness.”‎

Finally, Shehu Uthman laid out clear advice for those interested in pursuing the path of knowledge and its ‎transmission in his Iqtibaas al-`Ilm where he said: ‎

‎“Realize O brother eager to acquire knowledge upon whom it is clear in his soul the truthfulness of his desire and ‎excessive thirsting after it - if you intend by seeking knowledge: competition with others; boastfulness and pride; ‎seeking preference over one's colleagues; turning the faces of people towards you; or gathering the rubble of ‎this worlds life - then you have helped in the destruction of your deen, destroyed your nafs, and bartered your ‎Hereafter for your worldly life. Thus your bargain has become profitless and your trade has become unproductive. ‎Everything which you have learned will only assist you in your disobedience and it will be a partner with you in ‎your destruction.

  It is like your selling a sword to a highway robber to rob you with.  For whatever or whoever ‎helps you in disobedience, even by a single word, has become a partner with you in the crime.‎
However, if your intention and aim in seeking after knowledge is concerning that which is between you and Allah ‎ta`ala by learning knowledge and being guided, without mere showing-off; then rejoice for the Angels have ‎spread out their wings for you when you go out and the dwellers of the sea seek forgiveness of you when you ‎proceed.”‎

We ask Allah to make us among those for whom the Angels extend their wings and the creatures of the sea ‎seek forgiveness for.‎

www.siiasi.org

like

dislike

love

funny

angry

sad

wow